A systematic review of the costs and impacts of integrating variable renewables into power grids

The impact of variable renewable energy (VRE) sources on an electricity system depends on technological characteristics, demand, regulatory practices and renewable resources. The costs of integrating wind or solar power into electricity networks have been debated for decades yet remain controversial and often misunderstood. Here we undertake a systematic review of the international evidence on the cost and impact of integrating wind and solar to provide policymakers with evidence to inform strategic choices about which technologies to support. We find a wide range of costs across the literature that depend largely on the price and availability of flexible system operation. Costs are small at low penetrations of VRE and can even be negative. Data are scarce at high penetrations, but show that the range widens. Nonetheless, VRE sources can be a key part of a least-cost route to decarbonization.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

133,45 € per year

only 11,12 € per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Cost increase in the electricity supply to achieve carbon neutrality in China

Article Open access 08 June 2022

Rapid cost decrease of renewables and storage accelerates the decarbonization of China’s power system

Article Open access 19 May 2020

Regional disparities in emissions reduction and net trade from renewables

Article 14 December 2020

Data availability

The quantitative data shown in Figs. 2–6 and described in this paper (and in the Supplementary Information) are available in the Supplementary Data. The data are also deposited with the UKERC Energy Data Centre, a UK Research Councils funded data repository hosted by the STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (https://ukerc.rl.ac.uk/), with serial no. EDC0000162 at https://doi.org/10.5286/ukerc.edc.000010.

References

  1. Jansen, M. et al. Offshore wind competitiveness in mature markets without subsidy. Nat. Energy5, 614–622 (2020).
  2. Ford, J. Nuclear is less costly than you think. Financial Times (27 January 2019).
  3. Helm, D. Cost of Energy Review (Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, 2017).
  4. System Integration of Renewables—An update on Best Practice (International Energy Agency, 2018).
  5. Analysing Technical Constraints on Renewable Generation to 2050—A report to the Committee on Climate Change (Pöyry, 2011).
  6. Gross, R. et al. Renewables and the grid: understanding intermittency. Proc. ICE Energy160, 31–41 (2007).
  7. Gross, R. et al. The Costs and Impacts of Intermittency (UK Energy Research Centre, 2006).
  8. Heptonstall, P., Gross, R. & Steiner, F. The Costs and Impacts of Intermittency—2016 Update (UK Energy Research Centre, 2017).
  9. Renewables 2019 Global Status Report (REN21 Secretariat, 2019).
  10. Renewable Energy Statistics 2017 (International Renewable Energy Agency, 2017).
  11. Lazard’s Levelized Cost of Energy analysis—Version 12.0 (Lazard, 2018).
  12. Contracts for the Hinkley Point C (Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, 2016).
  13. Contracts for Difference (CfD) Allocation Round 3: Results (Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, 2019).
  14. Quarterly Report on European Electricity Markets (Market Observatory for Energy, DG Energy, 2019).
  15. Mills, A. & Wiser, R. Changes in the Economic Value of Variable Generation at High Penetration Levels: A Pilot Case Study of California (Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2012).
  16. Ueckerdt, F., Hirth, L., Luderer, G. & Edenhofer, O. System LCOE: what are the costs of variable renewables? Energy63, 61–75 (2013). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hirth, L., Ueckerdt, F. & Edenhofer, O. Integration costs revisited—an economic framework for wind and solar variability. Renew. Energy74, 925–939 (2015). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. The Future of Solar Energy (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2015).
  19. Heuberger, C. F., Staffell, I., Shah, N. & Dowell, N. M. A systems approach to quantifying the value of power generation and energy storage technologies in future electricity networks. Comput. Chem. Eng.107, 247–256 (2017). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Sepulveda, N. A., Jenkins, J. D., de Sisternes, F. J. & Lester, R. K. The role of firm low-carbon electricity resources in deep decarbonization of power generation. Joule2, 2403–2420 (2018). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Jenkins, J. D., Luke, M. & Thernstrom, S. Getting to zero carbon emissions in the electric power sector. Joule2, 2498–2510 (2018). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. The New Economics of Offshore Wind (Aurora Energy Research Ltd., 2018).
  23. Musker, T. Wholesale Power Price Cannibalisation (Cornwall Insight, 2018).
  24. Strbac, G. & Aunedi, M. Whole-system Cost of Variable Renewables in Future GB Electricity System, Joint Industry Project with RWE Innogy, Renewable Energy Systems and Scottish Power Renewables. (E3G,: 2016).
  25. Müller, S. et al. (eds) System Integration Costs—A Useful Concept that is Complicated to Quantify? (Wind Integration Workshop, 2019).
  26. The Grid Code (National Grid Electricity Transmission, 2016).
  27. National Grid Balancing Services 2019 (National Grid, 2019); https://www.nationalgrideso.com/balancing-services
  28. Rebours, Y. G., Kirschen, D. S., Trotignon, M. & Rossignol, S. A survey of frequency and voltage control ancillary services. Part I: technical features. IEEE Trans. Power Syst.22, 350–357 (2007). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Ela, E. et al. (eds) Evolution of operating reserve determination in wind power integration studies. In IEEE PES General Meeting 1–8 (IEEE, 2010).
  30. Dowell, J., Hawker G., Bell K. & Gill S. (eds) A Review of probabilistic methods for defining reserve requirements. In 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) 1–5 (IEEE, 2016).
  31. Holttinen, H. et al. Design and Operation of Power Systems with Large Amounts of Wind Power Final Summary Report, IEA WIND Task 25, Phase Three 2012–2014 (VTT Technical Research Centre, 2016).
  32. Dent, C. J. et al. (eds) The role of risk modelling in the Great Britain transmission planning and operational standards. In 2010 IEEE 11th International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS) 325–330 (IEEE, 2010).
  33. Holttinen, H. et al. Design and Operation of Power Systems with Large Amounts of Windpower Final Report, IEA WIND Task 25, Phase One 2006–2008. (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2009).
  34. Elliott, D. A balancing act for renewables. Nat. Energy1, 15003 (2016). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Joos, M. & Staffell, I. Short-term integration costs of variable renewable energy: wind curtailment and balancing in Britain and Germany. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.86, 45–65 (2018). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Electricity security of supply—A commentary on National Grid’s Future Energy Scenarios for the Next Three Winters (Ofgem, 2015).
  37. Nuclear Energy and Renewables: System Effects in Low-carbon Electricity Systems (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency, 2012).
  38. 2015/16 Winter Outlook Report Warwick (National Grid, 2015).
  39. Electricity Capacity Assessment Report 2014 (Ofgem, 2014).
  40. Skea, J. et al. Intermittent renewable generation and the cost of maintaining power system reliability. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib.2, 82–89 (2008). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Ensslin, C., Milligan, M., Holttinen, H., Malley, M. O. & Keane, A. (eds) Current methods to calculate capacity credit of wind power. In 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting—Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century 1–3 (IEEE, 2008).
  42. Keane, A. et al. Capacity value of wind power. IEEE Trans. Power Syst.26, 564–572 (2011). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Milligan, M. & Porter, K. Determining the Capacity Value of Wind: An Updated Survey of Methods and Implementation (NREL, 2008).
  44. Hirth, L. The market value of variable renewables: the effect of solar wind power variability on their relative price. Energy Econ.38, 218–36. (2013). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Few, S. Solutions to the Problem of Over-plotting in Graphs Visual Business Intelligence Newsletter (Perceptual Edge, 2008); https://web2.utc.edu/~fgg366/4270/4270Notes/Text/Ch03/over-plotting_in_graphs.pdf
  46. Power Sector Modelling: System Cost Impact of Renewables Report for the National Infrastructure Commission (Aurora Energy Research Limited, 2018).
  47. Accelerated Electrification and the GB Electricity System Report Prepared for Committee on Climate Change (Vivid Economics, Imperial College London, 2019).
  48. Market Observatory for Energy Quarterly Report on European Electricity Markets (European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy, 2019).
  49. Pudjianto D., Djapic P., Dragovic J. & Strbac G. Grid Integration Cost of Photovoltaic Power Generation: Direct Costs Analysis related to Grid Impacts of Photovoltaics (Imperial College London, 2013).
  50. Milligan, M. et al. Integration of variable generation, cost-causation, and integration costs. Electr. J.24, 51–63 (2011). Google Scholar
  51. Gorman, W., Mills, A. & Wiser, R. Improving estimates of transmission capital costs for utility-scale wind and solar projects to inform renewable energy policy. Energy Policy135, 110994 (2019). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Perez, R., Taylor, M., Hoff, T. & Ross, J. P. Reaching consensus in the definition of photovoltaics capacity credit in the USA: a practical application of satellite-derived solar resource data. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sens.1, 28–33 (2008). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Denny E., Bryans G., Gerald J. F. & Malley M. O. (eds) A quantitative analysis of the net benefits of grid integrated wind. In 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting 8 (IEEE, 2006).
  54. Maddaloni, J. D., Rowe, A. M. & van Kooten, G. C. Network constrained wind integration on Vancouver Island. Energy Policy36, p591–p602 (2008). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Kling W. L., Gibescu M., Ummels B. C. & Hendriks R. L. (eds) Implementation of wind power in the Dutch power system. In 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting—Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century 1–6 (IEEE, 2008).
  56. Lew, D. et al. The Western Wind and Solar Integration Study Phase 2 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2013).
  57. Fripp, M. Greenhouse gas emissions from operating reserves used to backup large-scale wind power. Environ. Sci. Technol.45, 9405–9412 (2011). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. ECOFYS. Siemens-PTI, Ecar. Facilitation of Renewables (EirGrid and SONI, 2010).
  59. Bell, K. & Hawker, G. Security of Electricity Supply in a Low-carbon Britain: A review of the Energy Research Partnership’s Report “Managing Flexibility Whilst Decarbonising the GB Electricity System” (UK Energy Research Centre, 2016).
  60. Ela, E. et al. Active Power Controls from Wind Power: Bridging the Gaps (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2014).
  61. EirGrid, Soni Ensuring a Secure, Reliable and Efficient Power System in a Changing Environment (EirGrid, 2011).
  62. EirGrid, Soni RoCoF Alternative & Complementary Solutions Project Phase 2 Study Report (A DS3 Programme Report) (EirGrid, 2016).
  63. Green, R. & Vasilakos, N. Market behaviour with large amounts of intermittent generation. Energy Policy38, 3211–3220 (2010). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Grubb, M. J. Value of variable sources on power systems. IEE Proc. C138, 149–165 (1991); https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/ip-c.1991.0018.
  65. Impact of Intermittency: How Wind Variability Could Change the Shape of the British and Irish Electricity Markets Summary Report (Pöyry, 2009).
  66. The Challenges of Intermittency in North West European Power Markets: The Impacts When Wind and Solar Deployment Reach their Target Levels (Pöyry, 2011).
  67. Borenstein, S. The Market Value and Cost of Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Production (Center for the Study of Energy Markets, 2008).
  68. Joskow, P. L. Comparing the costs of intermittent and dispatchable electricity generating technologies. Am. Economic Rev.101, 238–241 (2011). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Klinge Jacobsen, H. & Zvingilaite, E. Reducing the market impact of large shares of intermittent energy in Denmark. Energy Policy38, 3403–3413 (2010). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Sorrell S. Improving the evidence base for energy policy: the role of systematic reviews. Energy Policy35, 1858–1871 (2007).
  71. Technology and Policy Assessment London (UK Energy Research Centre; 2019); http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/programmes/technology-and-policy-assessment.html
  72. Statistical Interactive Database—Interest & Exchange Rates Data (Bank of England; accessed October 2018); http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/boeapps/iadb/index.asp?first=yes&SectionRequired=I&HideNums=-1&ExtraInfo=true
  73. Eurostat Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) Database (European Commission, 2018).
  74. Greenblatt, J. B., Succar, S., Denkenberger, D. C., Williams, R. H. & Socolow, R. H. Baseload wind energy: modeling the competition between gas turbines and compressed air energy storage for supplemental generation. Energy Policy35, 1474–1492 (2007). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Strbac, G., Shakoor, A., Black, M., Pudjianto, D. & Bopp, T. Impact of wind generation on the operation and development of the UK electricity systems. Electr. Power Syst. Res.77, 1214–1227 (2007). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Brouwer, A. S., van den Broek, M., Seebregts, A. & Faaij, A. Impacts of large-scale intermittent renewable energy sources on electricity systems, and how these can be modeled. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.33, 443–466 (2014). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Holttinen, H. et al. Impacts of large amounts of wind power on design and operation of power systems, results of IEA collaboration. Wind Energy14, 179–92. (2011). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Helander, A., Holttinen, H. & Paatero, J. Impact of wind power on the power system imbalances in Finland. IET Renew. Power Gener.4, 75–84 (2010). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Denholm, P., Wan, Y.-H., Hummon, M. & Mehos, M. An Analysis of Concentrating Solar Power with Thermal Energy Storage in a California 33% Renewable Scenario (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2013).
  80. Strbac, G. et al. Value of Flexibility in a Decarbonised Grid and System Externalities of Low-Carbon Generation Technologies Report for the Committee on Climate Change (Imperial College London, 2015).
  81. Merz, SinclairKnight Growth Scenarios for UK Renewables Generation and Implications for Future Developments and Operation of Electricity Networks (Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, 2008).
  82. Holttinen, H. et al. Design and Operation of Power Systems with Large Amounts of Wind Power Final Summary Report, IEA WIND Task 25, Phase Two 2009–2011 (VTT Technical Research Centre, 2013).
  83. Soder L. & Amelin M. (eds) A review of different methodologies used for calculation of wind power capacity credit. In 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting—Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century 1–5 (IEEE, 2008).
  84. Pape, C. The impact of intraday markets on the market value of flexibility—decomposing effects on profile and the imbalance costs. Energy Econ.76, 186–201 (2018). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Huuki, H., Karhinen, S., Kopsakangas-Savolainen, M. & Svento, R. Flexible demand and supply as enablers of variable energy integration. J. Clean. Prod.258, 120574 (2020). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Scholz, Y., Gils, H. C. & Pietzcker, R. C. Application of a high-detail energy system model to derive power sector characteristics at high wind and solar shares. Energy Econ.64, 568–582 (2017). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Doherty, R., Outhred, H. & Malley, M. O. Establishing the role that wind generation may have in future generation portfolios. IEEE Trans. Power Syst.21, 1415–1422 (2006). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Luickx, P., Vandamme, W., Perez, P. S., Driesen, J. & Haeseleer, W. D. (eds) Applying Markov chains for the determination of the capacity credit of wind power. In 6thInternational Conference on the European Energy Market 1–6 (IEEE, 2009).
  89. Tuohy, A. & O’Malley, M. Pumped storage in systems with very high wind penetration. Energy Policy39, 1965–1974 (2011). ArticleGoogle Scholar

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK Philip J. Heptonstall & Robert J. K. Gross
  1. Philip J. Heptonstall